Registered Health Information Administrator (RHIA) Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 400

Under the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act of 1936, when can records be admitted as evidence in court?

If they are signed by a notary public

If they were kept in the ordinary course of business

Records can be admitted as evidence in court under the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act of 1936 primarily when they were kept in the ordinary course of business. This act recognizes that business records, when created and maintained in a routine and systematic manner, provide a reliable and accurate reflection of activities and transactions. The intent of the law is to facilitate the use of such records in legal proceedings, acknowledging that businesses naturally generate documentation that is pertinent to their operations and often essential for legal clarity.

The context of this provision stems from the idea that documents created as part of regular business functions are less likely to be fabricated or altered, thus making them more trustworthy than documents generated for the purpose of litigation. By admitting these records as evidence, the court seeks to streamline processes and uphold the integrity of valid business operations.

Other options do not align with the main criteria established by the act. For instance, while notarization, electronic storage, or witness verification could enhance the credibility of records, they are not prerequisites for the admissibility of business records under this specific legal framework. This focus emphasizes the nature and manner of record-keeping within a business context as the fundamental requirement for their acceptance as evidence.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

If they are stored electronically

If they are verified by a witness

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy